The Power of Print Media
STATEMENT FROM ANDREI GEORGE DUNCA LLC
September 3, 2025
The allegations presented in the book Wallflower of The Year: EsRā Dunca‑Sprawling are deeply troubling. While we are not in a position to comment on the specifics, we recognize the seriousness of the claims and the emotional weight they carry.
We extend our sincere wishes for healing and resolution to EsRā Dunca‑Sprawling and Aaron Milton Harveland. This is a legal matter, and we respectfully ask that the process be allowed to unfold without speculation or interference.
Andrei George Dunca LLC will make no further statements on this matter.
WALLFLOWER of THE YEAR: A FORENSIC MEMOIR OF OBSESSION, DISAPPEARANCE, AND NARRATIVE RECLAMATION.
HOUSTON, TX / SAN FRANCISCO, CA / LOS ANGELES, CA – August 31, 2025 – Wallflower of the Year, a forensic memoir written by an anonymous source, is now available in print and on Kindle Unlimited. It traces the disappearance of Esrā Dunca-Sprawling (professionally known as Sean Sprawling), and all proceeds from the book will be donated to the LYRIC Center for LGBTQQ+ youth in San Francisco. The memoir, which reconstructs Esrā’s last known pathways through encrypted messages and legal detritus, also serves as a draft complaint in a high-stakes legal battle.
The book alleges a "meticulously crafted illusion" of a public romance between Esrā and social media personality Richard "Richie" Vetter. According to the memoir, their relationship, which included an anniversary dinner at Mr. Chow and an appearance at a Malibu gathering where Gladys Knight performed, was a "staged spectacle" designed as a "public smokescreen for covert harms." The book alleges that behind this façade, Vetter committed "Intimate Terrorism" through a pattern of coercive control, humiliation, and covert "spy videos" used for blackmail. The memoir also notes that Vetter's public association with influencer circles, including Jake Paul, served as relevant context for the narrative's social media ecosystem. The clustered timing of disappearances involving Vetter, Andrei Dunca, and another associate is presented as circumstantial evidence of a coordinated scheme.
The narrative also details the life and career of Esrā Dunca-Sprawling, the first and only American Geisha and only the second male in history to hold the status. A celebrated producer, actor, and writer, Sprawling has produced, co-written, and starred in works with international distribution across every major streaming platform. The book also highlights his collaborations on feature film projects with combined budgets totaling $15 million, including a script for "A Good Boy" that was consulted on by Oscar-nominated screenwriter Joe Robert Cole (Black Panther), and "The Camp," written by Oscar-winning screenwriter Iris Yamashita.
The book further reveals a draft complaint against Facebook (now Meta) and others, alleging that the company's 2014 acquisition of LiveRail for $500 million granted co-conspirators access to capital and networks used for cyberattacks. The complaint seeks damages, injunctive, and declaratory relief, with a jury trial demanded. The memoir alleges that disappearance is "not absence—it is architecture" and that public optics can be "weaponized to conceal private harm."
What really happened to Esrā Dunca-Sprawling, Andrei Dunca, Aaron Harveland, and Richie Vetter? The book invites readers to scrutinize the intersections among influencer economies, post-acquisition tech ecosystems, and the quiet mechanics of erasure.
Scope: A cinematic investigation that blurs intimacy and inquiry as the narrator hunts for EsRā Dunca Sprawling across corrupted archives, foreclosure files, and witness fragments.
Method: Affidavits, venue confirmations, metadata preserved media, and visual counterforensics are braided to challenge institutional narratives.
Thesis: Disappearance is not absence—it is architecture. The book documents how public optics can be weaponized to conceal private harm.
Legal proceedings involving Facebook (now Meta)
Case caption (Plaintiff’s draft):RODNEY SAMUEL SPRAWLING, also known as ESRĀ DUNCA SPRAWLING, and professionally as SEAN SPRAWLING also known as SEAN SPRAWLING, Plaintiff, v. FACEBOOK (NOW META), BLUEFISH AI, EZRA INC., UNFOLD PSYCHOLOGY, ILLUMINA SAFETY, PEER RESPONCE, and DOES 1 9, inclusive. Case No. [TBD]. COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES, INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, AND DECLARATORY RELIEF. JURY TRIAL DEMANDED.
Jurisdiction and venue:Jurisdiction: Causes of action arise from conduct within California.
Venue: Superior Court of California, County of San Francisco; Plaintiff resides there and substantial harms occurred there.
LiveRail linkage in pleading:Acquisition context: Facebook acquired LiveRail in 2014 for approximately $500 million.
Allegation: Plaintiff contends that post acquisition retention of specific co conspirators granted access to capital, networks, and resources allegedly used in cyberattacks against American citizens, including the Plaintiff.
Relief sought: Damages, injunctive relief (including no contact and preservation orders), and declaratory relief, with a jury trial demanded.
Why this story matters
These points summarize allegations contained in the memoir and draft complaint. They are not adjudicated facts and will be proven, if at all, in court.
EDITOR’S NOTE ON INTENT, NECESSITY, AND PUBLIC INTEREST
This book and press release may function, in effect, as a public outing for certain individuals, including Richard “Richie” Vetter, Dr. Richard Austin Heafey, Andrei Dunca, and a past lover. That is not our intention. The same privacy Esrā extended to those around him—and at times the fear that compelled him to keep others’ secrets—was weaponized to isolate him, keep him hidden, and, ultimately, to erase him.
We disclose these details out of necessity, not appetite. Material facts that bear on Esrā’s safety, the credibility of filings made in his name or against him, and patterns of coercion cannot be responsibly told without naming the people, places, and timelines that structure those facts. Redaction has already been used wherever it does not compromise truth, due process, or public safety, and we have withheld private details that are irrelevant to the allegations or Esrā’s disappearance.
If Esrā were here, he would step forward for his friends—as he repeatedly did for Vetter and others named in this book, often at personal cost. Our decision to publish reflects that ethic: choosing disclosure only where silence would further endanger Esrā, distort the record, or shield conduct already leveraged to harm him. The institutions and circles that protect Vetter, Dunca, Heafey, and their peers did not protect Esrā. According to the account set forth in the book, Esrā was jailed on false charges, rendered homeless, kidnapped, and disbelieved. He did not receive aid from those forces—or from the individuals themselves. Then Esrā went missing.
Vetter, Dunca, Heafey, and other named individuals can choose to use their position from the privileged space they inhabit to help Esrā. We choose Esrā. Other than themselves, who will these named individuals choose? We chose The Wallflower of The Year.
A Friend —Always.
Editor at Large, DaisyDaisy333.com
Statements above reflect allegations and first-person accounts contained in the memoir; they have not been adjudicated and are presented in the public interest.